simonandjuliet
Permanent resident
Posts: 2556
|
|
« on: 22 February, 2013, 07:28:45 AM » |
|
My brother in law is looking to buy a Fulvia coupe and has come across a low mileage third series car which may beof interest.
I have had a number of Fulvias but have always steered clear of a third series because of a ( mis) perception that they are not as nice as earlier cars ! I have been led to believe that they suffered from even less rust protection , performance stiffling emissions controls and poorer fittings
What are the views of better informed Fulvistas and should he hold out for a nice second series ? (He doesn't want a first series car)
Plus, what are values like versus other Fulvias and is a good third series likely to hold its value?
I hope not to open a can of worms, but hear your views !
Many thanks
|
|
|
Logged
|
AmilcarCGS, ApriliaCabrio,S2Aprilia, 2xArdea c'cino,S4 Ardea, Appia c'cino, Appia f'cino,B20s4,R4 Sinpar, R4 Rodeo, 65 Moke, 3xR60 Tractor, 2xToselli 78, Moto Guzzi Ercole,LR Defender, Mini ALL4 JCW, Moto Guzzi Cardellino, Fulvia GT, RE Himalayan
|
|
|
fay66
Permanent resident
Posts: 6231
|
|
« Reply #1 on: 22 February, 2013, 08:27:43 AM » |
|
Simon, I'm just curious, why not a series 1 Brian 8227
|
|
|
Logged
|
Own 1966 Fulvia 2C Berlina since 1997, back on road 11-1999.Known as "Fay" 2006 Renault Megane 1 5 Dci Sports Tourer Dedra Technical Adviser
|
|
|
simonandjuliet
Permanent resident
Posts: 2556
|
|
« Reply #2 on: 22 February, 2013, 09:53:55 AM » |
|
Quite simple, he prefers the 'look' and a 5 speed 'box
|
|
|
Logged
|
AmilcarCGS, ApriliaCabrio,S2Aprilia, 2xArdea c'cino,S4 Ardea, Appia c'cino, Appia f'cino,B20s4,R4 Sinpar, R4 Rodeo, 65 Moke, 3xR60 Tractor, 2xToselli 78, Moto Guzzi Ercole,LR Defender, Mini ALL4 JCW, Moto Guzzi Cardellino, Fulvia GT, RE Himalayan
|
|
|
fay66
Permanent resident
Posts: 6231
|
|
« Reply #3 on: 22 February, 2013, 11:43:40 AM » |
|
Quite simple, he prefers the 'look' and a 5 speed 'box
Fair enough Brian 8227
|
|
|
Logged
|
Own 1966 Fulvia 2C Berlina since 1997, back on road 11-1999.Known as "Fay" 2006 Renault Megane 1 5 Dci Sports Tourer Dedra Technical Adviser
|
|
|
lancialulu
|
|
« Reply #4 on: 22 February, 2013, 12:47:15 PM » |
|
There is not much different performance wise but the Interior is not as nice (in fact it is not nice).
The best option is to find a Series 1.5 with 5 speed and S1 suspension. 14 inch wheels help with pot holes...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Its not the winning but taking part! or is it taking apart? Lancias: 1955 Aurelia B12 1967 Fulvia 1.3HFR 1972 Fulvia 1600HF 1972 Fulvia Sport 1600 1983 HPE VX 1988 Delta 1.6GTie 1998 Zeta 21. 12v
|
|
|
chugga boom
Non-LMC Seller
Permanent resident
Posts: 1754
|
|
« Reply #5 on: 22 February, 2013, 03:09:23 PM » |
|
very little difference between s2 s3 fulvias, intruments in s2 are far nicer as is the steering wheel, seats in s3 are better, mechanically pretty much the same except early s2's have tubular upper wishbones where as late cars have pressed steel, reality on the road no differance, there are many arguements of why s1 or s2 or s3 is the best, truthfully a good s3 is as good as you will get, yes fiat did cheapen it but it was still a good quality exspensive car, i've owned 2 s3's on the road that have been trouble free and i've really enjoyed them, unfortunatly a rust free fulvia of any year is a holy grale, very rare and most have been repaired or patched over the years, my personal feeling is whatever fulvia he gets will put a huge smile on his face when driven,
|
|
|
Logged
|
1935 augusta lusso (chugga) 1935 belna saloon 1935 augusta lusso 1938 ardenne 1939 aprilia lusso 1958 appia s2 1963 appia s3 195? appia camioncino 1972 fulvia 1600HF 1976 fulvia coupe 194? ardea SUV "THE BEAST!!!"
|
|
|
Jai Sharma
Megaposter
Posts: 475
|
|
« Reply #6 on: 22 February, 2013, 10:23:28 PM » |
|
Personally I doubt there is much performance difference S2 to S3. Many of the bits that were changed (especially interior) could probably be swapped straight for s2 bits if you were that bothered (although there would be loss of originality, if that matters to you). The other thing that I suspect makes a difference to values now is the tax exempt 1973 cut-off.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chriswgawne
Permanent resident
Posts: 2083
|
|
« Reply #7 on: 23 February, 2013, 04:58:03 AM » |
|
I was lucky enough to have had a new S3 Fulvia having previously done many miles in an early S2 Coupe back in the early 70's. IMHO the S2 was better built as far as the body is concerned and I preferred the S2 instruments and interior in period as well. However these days I far prefer the S1 Fulvia range whether Saloon, Coupe or Sport and in many ways the earlier the better although there is no doubt the 1300cc engine makes life a little more interesting. The early cars just seem that more balanced and well packaged. Chris
|
|
|
Logged
|
Chris Gawne Mobile: 07778 216552
|
|
|
|