lancianut666
Permanent resident
Posts: 1795
Slow but rough
|
|
« on: 26 January, 2016, 11:25:55 AM » |
|
Hi all Had a chance to visit a consortium member who is rebuilding a Zagato for someone he knows. He has his hands full! Clarkey
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fulvia Coupe S2 Flavia Coupe 1967 1.8 Kugelfischer Prisma 1.6 carb Y10 Fila Y10 Touring Dedra 1.8 Dedra 2.0 Turbo Appia S1
|
|
|
fay66
Permanent resident
Posts: 6240
|
|
« Reply #1 on: 26 January, 2016, 11:27:41 AM » |
|
Lovely, 100mph without moving.
brian *227
|
|
|
Logged
|
Own 1966 Fulvia 2C Berlina since 1997, back on road 11-1999.Known as "Fay" 2006 Renault Megane 1 5 Dci Sports Tourer Dedra Technical Adviser
|
|
|
DavidLaver
Permanent resident
Posts: 4390
|
|
« Reply #2 on: 26 January, 2016, 01:59:20 PM » |
|
Looks like a lot of fresh skin, much structural work as well? Anyone know if the Appia and Flavia Zagatos have much in common in terms of construction?
Are those single tyres on the rack behind? Must be off something special...
|
|
|
Logged
|
David Laver, Lewisham.
|
|
|
JohnMillham
Lapsed
Permanent resident
Posts: 1045
|
|
« Reply #3 on: 26 January, 2016, 02:23:51 PM » |
|
Looks like a lot of fresh skin, much structural work as well? Anyone know if the Appia and Flavia Zagatos have much in common in terms of construction
Probably best not to ask, if my Fulvia example was anything to go by. Regards, John
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lancianut666
Permanent resident
Posts: 1795
Slow but rough
|
|
« Reply #4 on: 26 January, 2016, 05:09:02 PM » |
|
I like the trolley he has it on..I will have to make one
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fulvia Coupe S2 Flavia Coupe 1967 1.8 Kugelfischer Prisma 1.6 carb Y10 Fila Y10 Touring Dedra 1.8 Dedra 2.0 Turbo Appia S1
|
|
|
lancianut666
Permanent resident
Posts: 1795
Slow but rough
|
|
« Reply #5 on: 26 January, 2016, 05:11:14 PM » |
|
another piccie
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fulvia Coupe S2 Flavia Coupe 1967 1.8 Kugelfischer Prisma 1.6 carb Y10 Fila Y10 Touring Dedra 1.8 Dedra 2.0 Turbo Appia S1
|
|
|
frankxhv773t
Permanent resident
Posts: 2252
|
|
« Reply #6 on: 26 January, 2016, 05:41:27 PM » |
|
Brian, 100 mph without moving is easier with no wheels on. Less rolling resistance.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
williamcorke
Rebel Poster
Posts: 724
B10
|
|
« Reply #7 on: 26 January, 2016, 11:01:27 PM » |
|
There was a recent thread on the Alfa Giulietta 750/101 group (Yahoo) about whether to put a Sprint coupe on a rotisserie or on a stand (like the one in these photos, using - from what I can see - the suspension pick-up points). The experts' opinion was that repairing the lower body with the car on its side or inverted would lead to undesirable distortions in shape and 'incorrect' stresses.
I've had a B20 on a rotisserie for a long time, but thankfully it had retained its structural strength, so bumper mounts were more than adequate for the purpose. The next car I was planning to use the rotisserie for is a 750 Giulietta Sprint, which does need work to the sills, lower A posts and rear wheelarches. I'm now considering making a frame rather than put it on the spinner.
Does anyone have a view on this?
|
|
|
Logged
|
'37 Aprilia '50 B10 '53 B20 '68 Flavia Vignale '55 Giulietta Sprint S1 Land Rover
|
|
|
the.cern
Permanent resident
Posts: 1494
|
|
« Reply #8 on: 27 January, 2016, 09:24:02 AM » |
|
To be honest, I think that the answer is to use both!
I bought my rotisserie when I was quite advanced with the restoration of the B20. The whole of the sills and floor, where necessary, were replaced with the car on wheel dollies. The door openings were braced and check measurements were taken before the sills were cut out to ensure that there would be no distortion. Also the bumper mountings at the front were replaced/repaired as necessary. Only then was the car put on the rotisserie to allow final repairs, cleaning off, painting etc of the floorpan the roof etc etc. Improved access allowed by the rotisserie was invaluable in helping to speed up work and allowed a really thorough job!
In hindsight I would build a frame rather than leave the car on wheel dollies as that improves access for initial repairs to get the strength and rigidity required before the rotisserie comes into play. Of one thing I am sure, the better the access to all areas of the car the better the final job will be!!
Andy
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lancianut666
Permanent resident
Posts: 1795
Slow but rough
|
|
« Reply #9 on: 27 January, 2016, 11:43:48 AM » |
|
Hi Andy when you say frame do you mean the thing in my photos? I can see a rotisserie thing twisting the shell if the floors and sills are being replaced whereas using the stand/frame as in the pics the shell is clamped down and is to some extent locked to the stand as it is in this case connected to the engine mounts and the spring hangars in front of the rear axle. Clarkey
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fulvia Coupe S2 Flavia Coupe 1967 1.8 Kugelfischer Prisma 1.6 carb Y10 Fila Y10 Touring Dedra 1.8 Dedra 2.0 Turbo Appia S1
|
|
|
frankxhv773t
Permanent resident
Posts: 2252
|
|
« Reply #10 on: 27 January, 2016, 12:12:15 PM » |
|
I concur, use both.
The frame pictured is standard practice for bodywork repairs allowing the work to be mover around the workshop, in and out of paint booths, etc. My son's former work used one made of 8 inch "I" girders to which they would weld whatever supports are needed for a particular job. Temporary supports can be added and removed as the job dictates. However it does not allow easy access to the underside, especially for the older restorer with less mobility than in their youth. The secret to avoiding distortion is adequate bracing and frequent check measurements.
As to incorrect stresses, surely body shells are not under stress as they are being built. The purpose of the trolley/ rotisserie and bracing is to remove any load from the section being replaced and you should not remove so many bits at any one time that the remaining structure is structurally unsound.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
the.cern
Permanent resident
Posts: 1494
|
|
« Reply #11 on: 28 January, 2016, 09:43:54 AM » |
|
Frank, you have summed it up perfectly!
Clarkey, yes the frame is simply a support to which the shell may be attached at suitable points. The suitable points may vary, as the work progresses, as Frank points out, to provide support as appropriate to ensure no part being removed is under stress.
With regard to the frame, 8" I beams might be more than the home restorer would normally need, but the fundamental requirement is to have a solid base onto which the vehicle specific supports may be attached. Think about how high you want the vehicle to be to work on and, of course it, the frame, must go on castors, at least two of which should be lockable. My experience also dictates that castor wheels should be steel. Nylon etc will distort making it significantly more difficult to actually move the assembly.
Andy
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dannels
Megaposter
Posts: 305
|
|
« Reply #12 on: 28 January, 2016, 09:00:12 PM » |
|
Looks like there is very little left of zagatos work. This is probably better than it was originally...
|
|
|
Logged
|
1961 Flaminia GT, 1966 Matra Djet V
|
|
|
lancianut666
Permanent resident
Posts: 1795
Slow but rough
|
|
« Reply #13 on: 29 January, 2016, 01:35:45 PM » |
|
I think it has had a complete new front having been in a bump and also the door bottoms and some other parts have been replaced Clarkey
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fulvia Coupe S2 Flavia Coupe 1967 1.8 Kugelfischer Prisma 1.6 carb Y10 Fila Y10 Touring Dedra 1.8 Dedra 2.0 Turbo Appia S1
|
|
|
|